IN DEFENSE OF BIG GREEN…

IN DEFENSE OF BIG GREEN…

Being a pure comic book geek, some recent news just completely gave me a bout of excitement that prompted a giddy squeal, and that was the news that Edward Norton, one of my favorite actors of all time, will be portraying the hulk, in “The Incredible Hulk.”

Now this is just excellent news because I’m naturally attracted to anything Edward Norton does, because he is just one of the greatest actors of all time, and because…

Yes, are you ready for it?

Wait…

Here it comes…

I loved “Hulk.”

You gasp, and you groan, and roll your eyes, but fuck you, I loved “Hulk.” I went to see it in theaters when it opened, and goddamn if I wasn’t enthralled from minute one. Now. now, you Michael Bay and Eli Roth fans, don’t judge me, and don’t take this as an indicator that my opinion on movies are irrelevant. I mean, personally I could care less, but seriously folks, “Hulk” is a great film. and I’ll keep saying it, because I believe it so.

And Avi Arad, you in your infinite idiocy who cheered on “X-Men: The Last Stand,” and both “Fantastic Four” movies are not one to talk. I can’t take you seriously, and hard as you might try, the 2003 movie is still there. And you can start over, you can ignore the previous film, you can change his skin color, but with your guidance I’m frightened to see where this will go.

Though it’s become almost in vogue to declare a pure hatred for “Hulk,” I can accept that. People can have their opinions. But fuck, I love “Hulk.” I own it on DVD, I’ve seen it numerously, and I always tend to find something new from the experience. This new movie from Louis LeTerrier who directed the “Transporter” movies, will almost infinitely seek to turn the hulk into a prop, while the movie will be nothing but a non-stop smash and stomp movie with little story to it.

I predict it in the way of “Hulk” is to Tim Burton’s “Batman” as “The Incredible Hulk” will be to Joel Schumacher’s “Batman.”

Kid friendly, marketable, watered down, and without a story. But then again, Edward Norton is starring so my ass is planted in those seats once it arrives in theaters.

“But Felix, they had killer Dogs! And a giant poodle!”

Understandable. Very understandable. You can argue that, but shit to me it only conveyed the insanity of Nolte’s character and his sheer demented thought process in experimenting on poor animals, and his intent on driving his poor son to the brink of pure rage and insanity.

“But Felix, there was so much dialogue, and very little hulk smashing!”

Not true. Not true. There was plenty of hulk smash, and from what I’ve seen, I’d say there’s an excellent amount of action that isn’t the centerpiece, but acts as a reactionary movement in favor of the story. Bruce Banner’s hulk transformation is his psychoses playing out and this man is coming to grips with his life.

“But Felix, it was so boring!”

I disagree. It’s a fair comment, but I disagree. The hulk is all about psychology and psychoses, and the whole catalyst to the hulk is that his brain is his worst enemy. With his childhood abuse, he repressed his anger, thus the gamma rays somehow linked to his anger creating this manifestation of his repressed emotions and unresolved conflict turning his demons into a green monster. There was bound to be some sense of trying to break down Banner’s life to get down to the reason why the hulk kept appearing. And it’s obvious that there’d be some psychology behind a hulk film.

“But The hulk was nothing but CGI Ang Lee!”

Now there’s a stupid argument. I’m sorry, but Lee had in mind some of the hulk’s movements that he felt no one else could capture, so he put on the suit and performed the moves himself. That’s not only expected, but the hulk was still damn excellent to look at, and he took great pains to fight off helicopters, and tanks, and the whole lot. Andy Serkis played King Kong! Give me a break here.

“But, Nick Nolte’s character just ended up being Absorbing Man? It made no sense!”

Okay, and now Gwen Stacey is alive and possibly will be killed by Venom, and now Sandman is Uncle Ben’s killer, and now Sabretooth is just a goon and not the man with the connection to Wolverine’s past, and now Cyclops is some whiny pussy and not the soldier who constantly tussles with Wolverine, and now the professor is dead, and now Pyro and Iceman are enemies, and now Lana Lang is a cunt, and Clark is a submissive schmuck. Um… what’s your point, again?

Right, the fact he suddenly became Absorbing man. Well, Nolte’s character was a mad man whose own science turned on him and he decided to have it out with sonny boy. Both monsters, manifestations of their demons and alter egos, and they battled it out.

“But Felix, the characters were so boring!”

I disagree again. Jennifer Connelly was a wonderful balance to Banner’s repressed emotions, while Eric Bana was excellent as Bruce Banner, this thin and impish man who rarely ever spoke above an in door voice and was forced to confront his past. Nick Nolte was utterly fantastic as Banner father, a man who broke his son down mentally and challenged his inner being hoping to gain from it, while Josh Lucas was also very good as the antagonist Talbot who sought out to make Bruce’s life a living hell. And of course, there’s Sam Elliot, who was also pitch perfect as Betty’s father.

“But Felix, the direction was so cheesy!”

I loved what Ang Lee tried to do. Though I can see why some may deem the direction very off-putting. Lee tried to make the film a living comic book, something along the lines of “Creepshow” sans the horror, and I loved it! The scrolling split-screens, the blasts of color, the moving comic panels, and the overall tone are just fantastic to look at, still. And I just love what Lee set out to do with this. Even if you didn’t.

“But Hulk no talk! Why Hulk no talk?! It no fair!”

Hulk talked, he said “Betty…” but you have to understand that Lee was more interested in the monster than the human monster. He wanted the human to be completely disassociated with the monster. So when Bruce became Hulk, all essence of the kind gentle man known as Bruce was gone in his fit of rage. The monster took over. Only when speaking did he suddenly regain his humanity. But the hulk we saw was the early version, his silent monster.

“Me no buying it! Me pound you!”

Ah, fuck off.

And what else?

Well, I loved the action sequences, I loved Bruce’s slow deterioration back to the hulk as Betty led him to her, I loved the fight with the dogs, I loved the climax, and hell, I love that we’re not going to see Brendan Fraser as the hulk. That there puts a warm spot in this here heart “˜o mine.

You may call it defending a bad movie, and you have the right to think so. I don’t deny it has its flaws, and I accept that it’s generally despised, but to me I feel like I have to defend this film. The reason for that is because it’s an awfully misunderstood movie. Hell, can you really say it’s worse than “Daredevil,” or “Elektra,” or “Fantastic Four”? Look at the big picture. “Hulk” was a comic book movie for a more adult crowd.

I look forward to “The Incredible Hulk,” and I fully support Edward Norton as I always do. The bastard is just a raw actor who can make a horrible movie slightly better, but at the end of the day, I still love “Hulk.” And I always will. And I insist that it’s just misunderstood and an excellent adult comic book film.

Show some love for the green giant.




Posted on April 23, 2007 in Blogs by
Buffer


If you liked this article then you may also like the following Film Threat articles:
Popular Stories from Around the Web
8 Comments on "IN DEFENSE OF BIG GREEN…"

  1. Mark Bell on Mon, 23rd Apr 2007 5:30 am 

    When I first read the title, I thought this was going to be about that kids’ soccer movie from the mid-90′s…


    Report Comment

  2. Felix Vasquez Jr. on Mon, 23rd Apr 2007 1:16 pm 

    Hey that movie rocked too.

    Steve Guttenberg baby.

    He wouldn’t be anywhere without the Stonecutters.


    Report Comment

  3. Michael Ferraro on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 10:33 am 

    I actually liked the Hulk too. It quite amazed me that people were so put off on how Lee shaped this film to look like an actual comic. Also, it amazes me that people weren’t willing to look past this film’s flaws, yet they were so eager to overlook them on the Spider-man films.


    Report Comment

  4. Uncle Happy on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 10:40 am 

    I completely agree with all your points, as you now that I too love this movie. Every person I hear complain about usually says the same garbage “not enough action! Hulk shouldn’t have so much plot!” Bullshit, I say. The plot was engaging and beautifully tragic, like you said, it’s an adult comic movie. I guess only those with more mature tastes will ever truly appreciate it.


    Report Comment

  5. stateparks on Tue, 24th Apr 2007 8:09 pm 

    Another in agreement here … and the bit where Hulk trashes the tanks? I can watch that scene over and over … The people who don’t like Hulk, don’t like the Hulk, if you catch my drift …


    Report Comment

  6. Felix Vasquez Jr. on Wed, 2nd May 2007 4:22 am 

    Oh yes, Michael, people who insist that the CGI in “Hulk” was awful, really needs to see “Spider-Man.”


    Report Comment

  7. Nathaniel on Wed, 2nd May 2007 6:43 pm 

    I didn’t really care for Hulk, but I have the utmost respect for people who defend films they love with such passion.


    Report Comment

  8. Film Threat Blogs » Blog Archive » In Defense Of… Titan A.E. on Sun, 2nd Dec 2007 3:45 am 

    [...] Posted by Felix Vasquez Jr. in Writer’s Corner at 8:13 PM PST Being inspired by Don, I hope to make this a series of articles where I defend a movie that many don’t like, but I do. Read my first: In Defense of… Big Green, to see what I mean. I’ll try to keep this up. [...]


    Report Comment

Tell us what you're thinking...





Comments are governed by the Terms of Use of this Site. Click on the "Report Comment" link if you feel a comment is in violation of the Terms of Use, and the comment will be reviewed appropriately.