WE BOUGHT A ZOO

1.5 Stars
Year Released: 2011
MPAA Rating: PG
Running Time: 124 minutes
Click to Expand Credits:

With one line in “Jerry Maguire” (1996), Cameron Crowe officially switched gears from being an edgy rock n’ roll filmmaker to becoming the Crown Prince of Schmaltz. (It’s gotten so bad, that sometimes I’m not even sure his “good movies” deserve all their praise.) Nonetheless, “You complete me” now sounds like Yeates compared to some of the self-help advice uttered by the characters in “We Bought a Zoo.” The weird thing is, I don’t think he’s being disingenuous. I have a feeling that this is actually how Cameron Crowe lives his life, finding signs in everything and espousing about the importance of taking insane risks because life is an adventure. He loves love and he wants everyone else to love it too. Crowe’s emotional maturity is Benjamin Button, aging in reverse. Unfortunately, this means that “We Bought a Zoo” is an excruciating film for anyone not wearing rose-colored glasses.

The film is based on the real life experience of British journalist Benjamin Mee (Matt Damon), who moves his family from the city to a rural zoo in order to help them move past the untimely death of the family matriarch. The film quickly catches the audience up through heavy exposition. His troubled teenage son, Dylan (Colin Ford, a.k.a. flashback Sam Winchester on “Supernatural”) argues that it doesn’t matter if he’s been neglecting his studies in lieu of his artwork because “they’re not gonna give an F to a kid whose mom died 6 months ago.” His seven-year-old daughter, Rosie (a so-cute-it-hurts, Maggie Elizabeth Jones), occupies the precocious ray-of-sunshine role uttering such contrivances as, “their happy is too loud” of their perpetually partying neighbors. I suppose we’re meant to see it as inspirational when a widower with two children to feed, quits his job on a whim AND refuses a severance package because he’s “sick of sympathy.” An instant later, Dylan is kicked out of school for stealing, thus justifying Benjamin’s plan to “start over.”

What follows is a train wreck full of fluffy bunnies and rainbows. After an exhaustive, one-day search for a new home, Benjamin decides to buy the decrepit countryside zoo, home to 49 species of animals and an entire staff, simply because his daughter looks happy feeding some peacocks and the sunshine hits her just so as the music swells. The sun comes back time and time again to signify revelations and canonize the dead through photos and flashbacks. I hope it received a SAG day rate for its pivotal role in the Mee family’s emotional journey.

Crowe isn’t entirely to blame for this Sapfest. He punched up a script by Aline Brosh McKenna, the woman behind such inoculations of feminism as “27 Dresses” and “I Don’t Know How She Does It.” One shudders to imagine the original draft.

“Caricature” is a generous word to describe the supporting cast, as a caricature usually depicts more than one facet of a personality (skateboards AND hot dogs). The staff at the Rosemoor Zoo isn’t quite so complex. ScarJo is the no-nonsense head zookeeper who, after she warms to Benjamin, does little more than throw him supportive smiles. Patrick Fugit plays a guy who stands around with a monkey on his shoulder. Elle Fanning is the sweet teenage love-interest for Dylan. She tails him like a smiley, mute puppy dog for most of the movie and then gets mad because he doesn’t know how to talk to her. Thomas Hayden Church plays Benjamin’s accountant big brother (We know this because, at one point, he says, “Listen to your big brother, the accountant”). There is also a Scottish animal habitat designer with an adorable case of alcoholism, an uptight zoo accountant, and a petty inspector with a chip on his shoulder for no reason other than to create conflict and prompt a calendar-checking montage.

As for Damon’s performance, I see what he tried to do there. But his attempts at underplaying the melodrama are thwarted by come-to-life visions of his wife in happier times (they’re the sort of family who literally frolicked in a field with…airplane arms) and crying ONE SINGLE TEAR when scrolling through an iPhoto album. I usually enjoy his work, so I’m hoping this is just a fluke for him and that he hasn’t fallen prey to whatever it is that made Tom Hanks become a man who would agree to star opposite a volleyball. To his credit, it’s pretty hard to take the cheddar out of a thinly veiled terminally ill tiger metaphor. Benjamin all but calls the tiger by his wife’s name during this drawn-out parallel. The only one who comes out of that with any dignity in tact is the tiger.

Even in the worst Cameron Crowe films, the soundtrack is usually a bright spot. It appears that he’s lost that edge as well. Instead, he took a play from the McG Manual of Literal Soundtracks. “Don’t Come Around Here No More” underscores Dylan being expelled from school. “I Think It’s Going to Rain Today” plays when it rains. When Benjamin is writing checks beyond his means, he does so to Temple of the Dog’s “Hunger Strike.”

I do have to give the script props for not fast-tracking the Damon/ScarJo romance. Six months is not long enough to get over the alleged love of your life, no matter how much effort you’re putting into moving on. But they neutralize this authenticity by including stereotypical father-and-son issues. You know, the ones that could have long been resolved by simply listening to one other and admitting that you actually give a damn (Oh, you men).

Those are just some of the more glaring issues with a film that is essentially a parody of family melodrama. Here are a few more: The titular line is uttered THREE TIMES (twice by little Rosie in exactly the same tone). Dylan mainly draws severed limbs, but he’s also, unintentionally, a skilled graphic design artist. Benjamin has a bad rapport with the animals until he follows the staff’s advice that he should “just be real with them.” I could go on, but I think you get the point.

Cameron Crowe got his start as a rock journalist, but now he’s about as rock n’ roll as “River of Dreams”-era Billy Joel. Yeah, don’t see this movie.



Posted on December 23, 2011 in Reviews by
Buffer


If you liked this article then you may also like the following Film Threat articles:
Popular Stories from Around the Web
7 Comments on "WE BOUGHT A ZOO"

  1. Frank Lombardo on Fri, 23rd Dec 2011 3:00 am 

    Are you kidding?
    “River of Dreams” is one of Billy Joel’s best albums. You almost had me convinced to skip this film until I read your last sentence. Now I can’t wait to see it.
    F. Lombardo


    Report Comment

  2. Jessica Baxter on Fri, 23rd Dec 2011 11:51 am 

    Well, don’t say I didn’t warn you. :)


    Report Comment

  3. Don R. Lewis on Sat, 24th Dec 2011 7:05 pm 

    Jeeez Jessica! First THE MUPPETS, not this?!? You’re on a crusade to end any sweet and fun films. However, here I totally agree with you.

    I saw WE BOUGHT A ZOO today and found it really, really bad. And I’m a huuuuuge Cameron Crowe fan. Huge. I think that’s why I found it so lacking. It felt like a new album by a once great rock band that started to become irrelevant so it went back to the same hooks and sounds that once made it great. It felt like derivative Cameron Crowe.

    I also love his films because there’s honesty and truth wrapped around or equalling sentimentality. His schmaltz (as you noted) doesn’t feel phony or fake. But here it totally felt phony and slathered on. I didn’t really feel much for any of these characters as they just felt perfunctory to the inevitable end point. I thought all the acting was good and Scarlett particularly. She did more with her eyes and had a more subtle performance than usual. But stilll…blech.


    Report Comment

  4. Jessica Baxter on Wed, 28th Dec 2011 12:08 pm 

    I may be hard to please, but I assure you that I love sweetness and fun. “The Muppet Movie” makes me happy beyond measure and “Back to the Future” is my all-time favorite film. I also really like “Singles” and, though it is very much steeped in the culture of the 90s, I still think it holds up quite well. It’s mostly light and funny, with only a little bit of (genuine) drama thrown in.

    I’m not quite as sure about “Say Anything”, because Diane Court just gets more and more annoying to me as the gap between my youth and adult life grows. As aimless as he is, Lloyd is too good for her. And he definitely sells himself short on his potential. Damn kids!


    Report Comment

  5. Cyndi on Sun, 22nd Jan 2012 12:40 am 

    Ok, so like the rest of you I can be bitter and resentful of fluffy movies and people and well fluffy animals and all that cuteness sometimes too. But NOT this time. Sometimes it’s just nice to be able to put one’s brain in a jar for a long rest and sit back and enjoy some bubblegum for brains instead. I don’t think this movie was actually meant to be all so deep and meaningful as some of you obviously anticipated and were then disappointed by. I enjoyed this movie for the light fluff it was, gave me a bit of a giggle at times, and well, Rosie was so incredibly cute, I caught myself off guard actually grinning like an idiot when she gave her little wistful looks. Animals were divine, and let’s face it, any woman on the planet not in love with Matt Damon in any shape or form obviously needs her head read. This movie was delightful. Not deep, not very meaningful, but a nice light bit of fodder for those of us who like to relax and take some time out to give the brain a rest.


    Report Comment

  6. Jessica Baxter on Thu, 26th Apr 2012 5:06 pm 

    I guess I don’t really like to give my brain a rest.


    Report Comment

  7. Mike on Mon, 18th Feb 2013 5:19 am 

    One of the worst acting jobs Ive ever witnessed, and by EVERYONE….YUCK


    Report Comment

Tell us what you're thinking...





Comments are governed by the Terms of Use of this Site. Click on the "Report Comment" link if you feel a comment is in violation of the Terms of Use, and the comment will be reviewed appropriately.