DARLING COMPANION

0.5 Stars
Year Released: 2012
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Running Time: 103 minutes
Click to Expand Credits:

The latest from writer-director Lawrence Kasdan can be a very sad thing to watch. Not because it’s about a missing dog and the gabby, mismatched people who miss him but rather because every frame is a testament to diminished talent. At the same time, it is so insipid that, even if Kasdan’s previous work didn’t include classics like Body Heat, The Big Chill, Silverado and Grand Canyon, it still would qualify as a sorry sight.

This is what happens when a filmmaker runs out of things to say and then continues to make films anyway. Darling Companion offers the pointless portrait of a privileged Denver family which triumphs over three days of inconvenience in the Rocky Mountains. Diane Keaton gives one of her patented over-the-top performances in the role of empty-nester Beth Winter. Kasdan regular Kevin Kline costars as her husband, Joseph, a back surgeon whom-you guessed it-Beth accuses of thinking about work when he should be thinking about her.

Early on Keaton’s character freaks out when she spots an injured dog on the Colorado roadside. She rescues the animal and brings him home even though she knows Joseph doesn’t want a pet. Just as the director’s set the stage for a domestic face-off, though, he abruptly jumps forward to “One Year Later” when the dog has been dubbed Freeway and absorbed into the household. The transition is jarring, sloppy and a sign of trouble to come.

Following the wedding of their daughter, the couple repairs to their mountain home in the company of family and friends. These include Joseph’s sister Penny (Diane Wiest), her boyfriend Russell (Richard Jenkins) and her son Bryan (Mark Duplass). How much fun is this crew? The first chance it gets, the hound hightails it into the woods leaving the humans to spend the rest of the movie searching for it while simultaneously working out their snoozy issues.

Few who have followed Kasdan’s work over the years are likely to have envisioned him on a career path toward reimagining Lassie Come Home as a boomer dramady. Of course, I don’t mean to suggest Darling Companion is as bad as that sounds. The truth is it’s considerably worse. I haven’t even gotten to the gypsy.

I’m serious. Smack dab in the middle of a Lawrence Kasdan film we find a woman (Ayelet Zurer) who works as caretaker for the Winters while glimpsing the future in her spare time. At first, many will assume this to be a comic gesture on the part of the writers-Kasdan and his wife, Meg-but sadly, the joke’s on the audience. We’re to take seriously, it turns out, not only her magical gifts but her bottomless fountain of folksy wisdom.

Time seems to stand still as the three couples (Bryan hooks up with the gypsy) drop everything to look for the dog. Something happens every now and then but these incidents appear to have been pulled out of a hat. One can almost picture the scraps of paper with madcap ideas scrawled on them: Beth freaks out when she and Joseph are chased by rams. Somebody runs into a surly mountain man wearing a Harvard sweatshirt. Beth freaks out when Joseph falls and dislocates his shoulder. Just when you’re certain things couldn’t possibly get dopier, Beth freaks out after a dream consisting on an animated sequence in which Freeway is menaced by wolves. Huh?

Did I mention Sam Shepard turns up as a sheriff suffering from kidney stones? If Darling Companion accomplishes nothing else (and it accomplishes exactly that), it has to represent one of the greatest wastes of talent in Hollywood history. How did Kasdan get these people to show up? Did they not see the script? One can only hope that, in the future, the filmmaker’s powers won’t be limited to those of persuasion.



Posted on June 10, 2012 in Reviews by
Buffer


If you liked this article then you may also like the following Film Threat articles:
Popular Stories from Around the Web

Tell us what you're thinking...





Comments are governed by the Terms of Use of this Site. Click on the "Report Comment" link if you feel a comment is in violation of the Terms of Use, and the comment will be reviewed appropriately.