<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Film Threat &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/59764/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmthreat.com</link>
	<description>Celebrating 25 Years of Truth in Entertainment! Conversations about independent movies, top movies reviews and film festivals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 05:05:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FAITH IN DESTINY</title>
		<link>http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/59764/</link>
		<comments>http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/59764/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 05:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmthreat.com/?p=59764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visually, the film maintains strong composition throughout, though the image appears to have been modified in some way. There's often a faded look to shots, like the film was tweaked in post for a lower contrast. The result is a vagueness to the film's depth, with the image flattening, but it works when you consider the moral grey areas the narrative dances in and out are therefore being represented by the image in a more literal sense...<p>Read More at <a href="http://www.filmthreat.com">FilmThreat.com</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/59764/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>