COMPUTER CHESS

1 Stars
Year Released: 2013
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Running Time: 91 minutes
Click to Expand Credits:

This review was originally published on January 21, 2013…

You know when you stumble into a party by accident, and too embarrassed to get up and leave, you instead end up listening to people you don’t know talk about shit you don’t care about? Yeah, Computer Chess is a lot like that.

The premise is kind of cool: it’s a faux documentary in which computer science engineers battle at chess in order to see who developed the best gaming software. That’s where the cool factor ends. Shot to replicate the quality of a 1980’s film, the black and white visual looks cheap and the sound buzzes like a florescent light. The trade off for aesthetic effect is an interminably grating experience.

The story begins with the opening ceremonies of the chess competition, which takes place in a hotel conference room. The droning introduction by the host is supposed to amuse by its prolonged tedium—it’s not funny. The meandering action takes us into several hotel rooms where various individuals wax philosophic—they’re not profound. There are some general threads of story: a young kid (Riester) tries to fix a malfunctioning computer with the help of his renowned professor (Kindlmann); a couple’s therapy group conducts their hedonistic exercises in the shared hotel space; a displaced competitor (Paige) roams the halls, looking for a room to crash in.

Characters crop up, but with no real purpose, no depth, and no appeal, they fail to do anything of interest. Even when writer and director Andrew Bujalski pitches in some outlandish plot twists at the end, I swear it’s just to test if the audience is sleeping…



Posted on January 21, 2013 in Reviews by
Buffer


If you liked this article then you may also like the following Film Threat articles:
Popular Stories from Around the Web

Tell us what you're thinking...





Comments are governed by the Terms of Use of this Site. Click on the "Report Comment" link if you feel a comment is in violation of the Terms of Use, and the comment will be reviewed appropriately.